Drexel Engineers Use Fluorescent Imaging to Predict Battery Performance Before Assembly

An image of a lithium ion battery.

A Drexel University research team has developed a way to forecast lithium-ion battery performance by analyzing microscopic images of electrodes before cells are ever assembled, potentially transforming quality control in an industry where cell assembly and formation account for more than 60% of manufacturing costs.

Led by Maureen Tang, PhD, associate professor of chemical and biological engineering and affiliate faculty of mechanical engineering and mechanics, the study combines electrochemical fluorescence microscopy with machine learning to predict discharge capacity across multiple charge rates. The work appears in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and addresses a longstanding challenge in battery production: identifying suboptimal electrodes before they enter the costly downstream manufacturing steps.

The researchers analyzed nearly 200 fluorescence images from battery electrodes fabricated at Argonne National Laboratory. Using a technique called electrochemical fluorescence microscopy, the team mapped electronic connectivity across each electrode's surface by introducing a special fluorescent molecule that lights up only in regions where electrons can flow freely.

"When we apply a small current, the molecule fluoresces only in regions where continuous electronic networks exist," Tang explained. "This reveals connectivity with high spatial resolution. Bright areas indicate strong electronic pathways, while dark regions show electronically isolated particles that won't contribute to battery performance."

From each image, the researchers extracted statistical patterns capturing spatial organization and texture. A machine learning model trained on these image features predicted battery capacity with high accuracy and errors below 2%, using only a handful of key measurements. The most important indicator turned out to be the count of disconnected dark regions, which correspond to electronically isolated particles that cannot store or release energy effectively.

"Design practitioners can use our compact equation to predict performance from just a few image-derived metrics," said Karla Negrete, PhD ’25, the paper’s lead author. "We achieve accuracy comparable to impedance-based approaches while avoiding their reliance on post-formation data. That timing difference is critical for manufacturing."

The framework offers advantages over conventional testing methods, which measure electrical properties only after cells are fully assembled and undergo initial charging cycles. Those measurements also tend to report primarily on the best-connected pathways in an electrode, potentially masking weak spots that fluorescence imaging reveals directly.

The practical implications extend beyond cost savings. Nominally identical battery cells can diverge widely in capacity and lifespan, with the weakest units limiting module safety and reliability in electric vehicles and consumer devices. Early detection of electronic network defects could enable proactive screening before faulty electrodes compromise entire battery packs.

"This approach may expedite battery research and development by reducing the number of cell experiments required to determine electrode viability," Tang said. "For manufacturing quality control, we can detect defected electrodes upstream of cell assembly for faster feedback and reduced scrap rates."

The team notes that scaling this approach will require collaboration among national laboratories, academia and industry, establishing the foundation for performance-guided optimization in electrode manufacturing. Ultimately, data-driven manufacturing will rely on frameworks like this to connect electrode fabrication, electronic structure and battery performance.


In This Article