For a better experience, click the Compatibility Mode icon above to turn off Compatibility Mode, which is only for viewing older websites.

Phase One Focus Areas

The committee received 1,137 efficiency improvement ideas from 670 faculty and professional staff through the survey. The following focus areas represent the most frequent responses.

Focus Area

Leader(s)

Summary of Survey Responses

Academic Advising
Lindsay Norlen Lack of consistency with processes: some electronic, some paper; lack of standardized advising practices
Academic Programs Dean Paul Jensen Course/program approval needs to be faster and more efficient; address accessibility issues with online courses
Academic Structure Dean Allen Sabinson Duplication of effort in academic areas
Adjuncts Nicole Sugarman Contract process and systems access inefficiencies
Communications Marie Fazio Too reliant on mass emails; improve communication from top down and bottom up, across colleges/divisions
Contract Management Process Don Liberati Process and timeline for contract approval is lengthy and inefficient; roles in process are unclear
Customer Service Kim Gholston University-wide issue of delayed/lack of response, general lack of ownership/responsibility and lack of collegiality
Facilities Dr. Steven Wrenn Concerns regarding cleanliness and maintenance issues, including a lack of budget/deferred maintenance budget, for university-owned facilities
Financial Aid/Scholarships/Drexel Central Gabby Berrios Difficult to navigate which department to contact; customer service issues
Human Resources Anna Chrulkiewicz Improvements needed to the hiring process, development of professional development opportunities/career paths for professional staff, and review of performance and compliance processes; customer service issues
IT/Systems Sean Chung, Chris Plummer Concern was raised regarding the number of systems and lack of perceived integration between the systems; a stronger IT infrastructure is needed to support administrative processes
Organizational Structure Linda Lee Duplication of processes due to departments working in silos; poor communication across university; lack of cross-training/shared services
Paperless University Julie Jones, Kathryn Matuch Processes reliant on paper forms result in inefficiencies and duplication of work
Policies Megan Weyler Institute uniformity around format and approval process and regular review process for all policies; more input from stakeholders; better communicate new policies and policy revision
Procurement Mary Quigley Processes/policies could be simplified and made more efficient
Research Administration Dr. Frank Ferrone Inefficiencies in processes/procedures; COEUS Lite should be replaced
Sustainability Lisa Miller Lack of recycling options; focus on energy savings in all buildings
Work/Life Balance David Wilson Lack of flexibility in work hours/telecommuting: affects morale
University Budget/RCM Academic Resources Planning committee (revisit after their June report) Comments regarding the university's budget and RCM were among the most common responses to the survey, however, the Academic Resource Planning (ARP) group is in the process of analyzing this area. The IE Committee will work with ARP to determine whether the concerns raised in the survey results are addressed through their efforts, and, if not, convene a group to address.

Interested in Volunteering?

The committee is looking for a cross-functional team from various levels and roles across the university, including students, faculty and professional staff in order to gain multiple perspectives of knowledge and solutions. Complete this form if you would like to be considered to serve on one of the action planning committees. Please remember supervisor approval is required to serve. The time commitment is a one-hour meeting every other week, with the potential for work to be completed between meetings. Contact Lindsay Norlen at les37@drexel.edu or 215.571.4644 with any questions.